Underwear Bomber / The Right Response

December 28, 2009

Regarding the Delta Flight 253 successful passenger response to a Muslim attempt to blow up a plane over the US on Christmas: I have little to add to the following common sense links, except our nation will probably not do the right thing – profiling certain Muslims – until a few thousand – or a few million American citizens die under the banner of politically IN-correct ideas.

Muslim TSA agent searches a nun. I wonder if the “underwear bomber” would get past her.

 

WE MUST START PROFILING MUSLIMS AT AIRPORTS by Angry White Dude

The Conservative Monster (Mike Gallagher) had this video from Live leak (cant embed it, sorry. Right click below and open in new tab):

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=994_1262012824&c=1

And if there’s any doubt about the Muslim connection of this Doctor Detonator from Nigeria who got his explosives via Al Qaeda (Islamic) in terrorist hotspot Yemen (Islamic) who lived in London (becoming Islamic) … here’s some evidence. (click any of the below articles from Jihad Watch. For those of you who like multiple sources for confirmation, Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch provides them in the articles):

And THIS is a sick twisted (yet expected) kicker from Barack Obama:

And Jasper Schuringa, the main passenger on Flight 253, is a hero because Homeland Security head Janet Nipolatano refuses to aknowledge the war that’s been declared against us, and Do The Right Thing about it.

Advertisements

Boneyard, and Relevance to Today

July 5, 2009

My mom sent me pics of the “Boneyard” at Davis Monthan Air Force Base in Tuscon, AZ. The dry weather makes it a perfect place to store old aircraft.

My response to her follows:
I’ve seen Boneyard before.
Most of those planes were F4’s (vietnam era) and B-52’s (korea, vietnam).
I suppose technically, they could be returned to service (with a fair amount of help), but it’s unlikely …
these planes are technologically out of date, and would probably be much easier targets for our enemies (no radar deflection, slower turn rates, slower speeds, larger radar signature, less accurate navigation and targeting methods).
I’m not really concerned about the “millions” of dollars sitting on the ground;
in my estiamation that is one of the GOOD things our tax dollars pay for.
I wish Obama would quit funding deadbeats and bankers, and start fully funding a missile defense (which Obama has cut spending).
We’re really getting to be “sitting ducks” and we cant count on the (non-existent) goodwill of our (Islamic fundamentalist) enemies to not try to kill us; they will do it as soon as they’re ABLE (read that: as soon as we LET them).
Unfortunately, I think Obama WILL “let them.”
They think we’re suckers for letting our guard down,
and they’re right. The only thing that MIGHT wake us from our slumber is a sucker punch (a nuke in one or more of our cities).
I pray that God will deliver Obama from this type of “play nice-nice” ignorance that will certainly kill us (litterally).

History and Pictures of the “Boneyard” here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/309th_Aerospace_Maintenance_and_Regeneration_Group


“The Muslim World” One Way multiculturalism

June 9, 2009

Even if you’re a die-hard liberal, test this article by Mark Steyn and see whether the moral dictates are only one way. If we had a “Organization of Christian Conference” in the UN, if we ever uttered “the Christian world,” OH would there be outcries of bigotry. It’s seems the world gives a pass for Muslims to be bigoted, and the PC thought says we should just sit back and take our beatings. I don’t believe that for an instant. Evil exists, and it must be resisted, just like Hitler. But will we take as many years or a nuke or two in our cities to finally take action? It is an utter falacy that flies in the face of recorded human history to think that we can talk the evil of Islamic Supremecism into playing nice-nice with us. Please visit www.CitizenWarrior.com for more.

—————————————————–

By Mark Steyn

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2JmNDJlYTBiMGY2MzNkZDg2ZWM4ZTYzNjVhODU3YmI=&w=MA

As recently as last summer, General Motors filing for bankruptcy would have been the biggest news story of the week. But it’s not such a very great step from the unthinkable to the inevitable, and by the time it actually happened the market barely noticed and the media were focused on the president’s “address to the Muslim world.” As it happens, these two stories are the same story: snapshots, at home and abroad, of the hyperpower in eclipse. It’s a long time since anyone touted GM as the emblematic brand of America — What’s good for GM is good for America, etc. In fact, it’s more emblematic than ever: Like General Motors, the U.S. government spends more than it makes, and has airily committed itself to ever more unsustainable levels of benefits. GM has about 95,000 workers but provides health benefits to a million people: It’s not a business enterprise, but a vast welfare plan with a tiny loss-making commercial sector. As GM goes, so goes America?

But who cares? Overseas, the coolest president in history was giving a speech. Or, as the official press release headlined it on the State Department website, “President Obama Speaks to the Muslim World from Cairo.”

Let’s pause right there: It’s interesting how easily the words “the Muslim world” roll off the tongues of liberal secular progressives who’d choke on any equivalent reference to “the Christian world.” When such hyper-alert policemen of the perimeter between church and state endorse the former but not the latter, they’re implicitly acknowledging that Islam is not merely a faith but a political project, too. There is an “Organization of the Islamic Conference,” which is already the largest single voting bloc at the U.N. and is still adding new members. Imagine if someone proposed an “Organization of the Christian Conference” that would hold summits attended by prime ministers and presidents, and vote as a bloc in transnational bodies. But, of course, there is no “Christian world”: Europe is largely post-Christian and, as President Obama bizarrely asserted to a European interviewer last week, America is “one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.” Perhaps we’re eligible for membership in the OIC.

I suppose the benign interpretation is that, as head of state of the last superpower, Obama is indulging in a little harmless condescension. In his Cairo speech, he congratulated Muslims on inventing algebra and quoted approvingly one of the less bloodcurdling sections of the Koran. As socio-historical scholarship goes, I found myself recalling that moment in the long twilight of the Habsburg Empire when Crown Prince Rudolph and his mistress were found dead at the royal hunting lodge at Mayerling — either a double suicide, or something even more sinister. Happily, in the Broadway musical version, instead of being found dead, the star-crossed lovers emigrate to America and settle down on a farm in Pennsylvania. Recently, my old comrade Stephen Fry gave an amusing lecture at the Royal Geographical Society in London on the popular Americanism “When life hands you lemons, make lemonade” — or, if something’s bitter and hard to swallow, add sugar and sell it. That’s what the president did with Islam: He added sugar and sold it.

The speech nevertheless impressed many conservatives, including Rich Lowry, my esteemed editor at National Review, “esteemed editor” being the sort of thing one says before booting the boss in the crotch. Rich thought that the president succeeded in his principal task: “Fundamentally, Obama’s goal was to tell the Muslim world, ‘We respect and value you, your religion and your civilization, and only ask that you don’t hate us and murder us in return.’” But those terms are too narrow. You don’t have to murder a guy if he preemptively surrenders. And you don’t even have to hate him if you’re too busy despising him. The savvier Muslim potentates have no desire to be sitting in a smelly cave in the Hindu Kush sharing a latrine with a dozen halfwitted goatherds while plotting how to blow up the Empire State Building. Nevertheless, they share key goals with the cave dwellers — including the wish to expand the boundaries of “the Muslim world” and (as in the anti-blasphemy push at the U.N.) to place Islam, globally, beyond criticism. The non-terrorist advance of Islam is a significant challenge to western notions of liberty and pluralism.

Once Obama moved on from the more generalized Islamoschmoozing to the details, the subtext — the absence of American will — became explicit. He used the cover of multilateralism and moral equivalence to communicate, consistently, American weakness: “No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons.” Perhaps by “no single nation” he means the “global community” should pick and choose, which means the U.N. Security Council, which means the Big Five, which means that Russia and China will pursue their own murky interests and that, in the absence of American leadership, Britain and France will reach their accommodations with a nuclear Iran, a nuclear North Korea, and any other psycho-state minded to join them.

On the other hand, a “single nation” certainly has the right to tell another nation anything it wants if that nation happens to be the Zionist Entity: As Hillary Clinton just instructed Israel re its West Bank communities, there has to be “a stop to settlements — not some settlements, not outposts, not natural-growth exceptions.” No “natural growth”? You mean, if you and the missus have a kid, you’ve got to talk gran’ma into moving out? To Tel Aviv, or Brooklyn, or wherever? At a stroke, the administration has endorsed “the Muslim world”’s view of those non-Muslims who happen to find themselves within what it regards as lands belonging to Islam: The Jewish and Christian communities are free to stand still or shrink, but not to grow. Would Obama be comfortable mandating “no natural growth” to Israel’s million-and-a-half Muslims? No. But the administration has embraced the “the Muslim world”’s commitment to one-way multiculturalism, whereby Islam expands in the west but Christianity and Judaism shrivel remorselessly in the Middle East.

And so it goes. Like General Motors, America is “too big to fail.” So it won’t, not immediately. It will linger on in a twilight existence sclerotic and ineffectual, declining unto a kind of societal dementia, unable to keep pace with what’s happening and with an ever more tenuous grip on its own past, but able on occasion to throw out impressive words albeit strung together without much meaning: empower, peace, justice, prosperity — just to take one windy gust from the president’s Cairo speech.

There’s better phrase-making in the current issue of Foreign Affairs, in a coinage of Leslie Gelb, president emeritus of the Committee on Foreign Relations. The president emeritus is a sober, judicious paragon of torpidly conventional wisdom. Nevertheless, musing on American decline, he writes, “The country’s economy, infrastructure, public schools, and political system have been allowed to deteriorate. The result has been diminished economic strength, a less vital democracy, and a mediocrity of spirit.” That last is the one to watch: A great power can survive a lot of things, but not “a mediocrity of spirit.” A wealthy nation living on the accumulated cultural capital of a glorious past can dodge its rendezvous with fate, but only for a while. That sound you heard in Cairo is the tingy ping of a hollow superpower.